Fijian vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,100,179 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 20.6 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.7%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $57,309, a difference of 25.7%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $45,426, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,247, a difference of 0.23%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $61,673, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $39,510, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.17%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 58.4%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.3%).