Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Kuwait Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,463,635 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Kuwait. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Immigrants from Kuwait.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $46,543, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $98,122, a difference of 19.5%), and median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $57,562, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $64,433, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($46,902 compared to $41,055, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.36%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (63.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 66.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.8%), master's degree (22.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.0%).