Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,008,366 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 82.2 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $51,361, a difference of 11.7%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $63,346, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $108,149, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $55,028, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $66,087, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.3%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 58.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.2%).