British West Indian vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,919,003 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 36.2%), householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $60,217, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $97,400, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,552 compared to $45,598, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $50,645, a difference of 2.4%), and median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $38,810, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 44.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 43.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (22.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.2%), married-couple households (38.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 212.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 99.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 28.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 59.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and college, under 1 year (59.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%).