Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,478,343 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.220% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to an increase of 220.4 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,045 compared to $91,337, a difference of 17.0%), median household income ($71,801 compared to $83,327, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,207 compared to $97,400, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,017 compared to $38,810, a difference of 7.7%), per capita income ($38,848 compared to $42,289, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (40.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 12.7%), currently married (42.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and associate's degree (45.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and cognitive disability (19.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.41%).