Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,409,718 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 17.2 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $60,217, a difference of 5.7%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $42,289, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $50,645, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $52,908, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $91,337, a difference of 0.18%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $45,598, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family poverty (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (45.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.2%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%).