Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,395,884 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from Serbia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Serbia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Serbia corresponds to a decrease of 60.8 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,810 compared to $42,289, a difference of 20.2%), median male earnings ($60,600 compared to $52,908, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($113,463 compared to $99,840, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,387 compared to $60,217, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,321 compared to $50,645, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 25.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.68%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (61.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.0%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.3%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%).