Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,080,838 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 127.7 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $50,645, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $60,217, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $38,810, a difference of 0.24%), median earnings ($45,933 compared to $45,598, a difference of 0.74%), and median family income ($101,061 compared to $99,840, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.1%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.4%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (66.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.74%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.37%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%).