Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,827,835 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $60,217, a difference of 11.6%), and per capita income ($44,552 compared to $42,289, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,555 compared to $83,327, a difference of 0.27%), median earnings ($46,094 compared to $45,598, a difference of 1.1%), and median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $52,908, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 43.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.50%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 33.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.0%), births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.9%), bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.22%), disability (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).