Crow vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,403,974 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 96.6 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $42,289, a difference of 33.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $97,400, a difference of 31.2%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $83,327, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $50,645, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,810, a difference of 10.1%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $45,598, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 91.5%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 79.4%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 235.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 234.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 227.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.27, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.6%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%).