Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,900,254 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 61.5 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 14.4%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $38,810, a difference of 6.9%), and per capita income ($44,509 compared to $42,289, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $97,400, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $60,217, a difference of 0.20%), and median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $52,908, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.3%), family households (60.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.0%).