Central American vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,892,346 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.3%), median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $39,910, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($38,560 compared to $41,709, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $92,208, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $55,394, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($78,803 compared to $80,722, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.66%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.9%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 138.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 82.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 63.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 38.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.6%).