Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,063,119 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 39.9 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 25.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $54,714, a difference of 19.4%), and median household income ($68,412 compared to $80,722, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,475 compared to $55,394, a difference of 9.7%), median male earnings ($46,656 compared to $51,642, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($40,107 compared to $45,532, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.7%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and single female poverty (27.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.010%), male poverty (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 130.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 19.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 66.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.36%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.5% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and high school diploma (86.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 126.9%), hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.4%).