Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,349,246 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $55,394, a difference of 23.8%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $94,665, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $39,910, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,714, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $92,208, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 32.7%), receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 45.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (44.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 195.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 49.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 22.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 42.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.3%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 42.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.17%), 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 7th grade (93.8% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 34.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%).