Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,049,150 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($102,823 compared to $94,665, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $55,394, a difference of 8.5%), and per capita income ($44,509 compared to $41,709, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,466 compared to $90,448, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $39,910, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.3%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.0%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households (60.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 142.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 49.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.0%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 37.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.77%).