Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,190,623 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.864% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 864.1 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $55,394, a difference of 17.0%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $80,722, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $92,208, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,694 compared to $41,709, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $54,714, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $39,910, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 32.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.9%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.3%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.36, a difference of 2.7%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 229.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 147.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 108.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 24.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 60.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 108.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.7%).