White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,935,003 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 36.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,714, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $92,208, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,197 compared to $45,532, a difference of 0.74%), per capita income ($42,180 compared to $41,709, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $90,448, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 55.2%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.0%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 37.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.4%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.36, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 266.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 88.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 25.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 56.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 80.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.9%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 94.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).