Lithuanian vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,098,396 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.110% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 110.0 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $45,605, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $99,186, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $64,313, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $41,464, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $91,794, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.55%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.4%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.94%), currently married (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%).