Houma vs Jordanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Jordanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Jordanians
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jordanian Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,350,392 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.993. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.332% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 1,332.2 Jordanians.
Houma vs Jordanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $109,376, a difference of 51.7%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $91,794, a difference of 46.7%), and wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $58,500, a difference of 15.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,796, a difference of 16.8%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $49,632, a difference of 27.4%).
Income Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Excellent $45,605 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $109,865 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $91,794 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $49,632 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $58,500 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $41,464 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Fair $51,796 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $99,186 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $109,376 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $64,313 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 26.8% |
Houma vs Jordanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 91.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 88.2%), and single female poverty (33.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 40.8%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Houma vs Jordanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 81.9%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.3% |
Houma vs Jordanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Fair 36.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Houma vs Jordanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 63.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Houma vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 34.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 25.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 6.6% |
Houma vs Jordanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 113.9%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 109.2%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 108.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 68.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Houma vs Jordanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 84.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 74.2%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.3%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Jordanian |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |