Fijian vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,011,248 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.944. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 20.5 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $109,376, a difference of 28.4%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $58,500, a difference of 28.3%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $109,865, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $51,796, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $64,313, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.6%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 77.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.0%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 6.5%).