Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,424,488 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 17.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $109,376, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $58,500, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $51,796, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $41,464, a difference of 2.0%), and per capita income ($43,838 compared to $45,605, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.28%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.23%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and bachelor's degree (40.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.8%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%).