Slavic vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Jordanians

Good
Exceptional
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,647,103 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.958% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 2,957.8 Jordanians.
Slavic Integration in Jordanian Communities

Slavic vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $109,376, a difference of 6.6%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $91,794, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $41,464, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,049 compared to $45,605, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $51,796, a difference of 2.4%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricSlavicJordanian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
26.8%

Slavic vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.3%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.66%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicJordanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.2%

Slavic vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicJordanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Good
5.3%

Slavic vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Slavic vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 10.8%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.73%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicJordanian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
28.5%

Slavic vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Slavic vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.5%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%

Slavic vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.17%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Slavic vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricSlavicJordanian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%