French American Indian vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,222,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $55,082, a difference of 36.9%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $123,831, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $118,932, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $54,830, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $44,587, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.62%), family households (62.4% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 84.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.2%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.4%).