Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,729,016 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 5.5 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $55,082, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $69,703, a difference of 7.5%), and median family income ($115,523 compared to $123,831, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $54,830, a difference of 0.35%), median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $44,587, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($52,195 compared to $54,679, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.14%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%).