Immigrants from Cameroon vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,492,426 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Cameroon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cameroon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cameroon corresponds to an increase of 10.2 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,334 compared to $55,082, a difference of 33.3%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,214 compared to $112,575, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,433 compared to $54,830, a difference of 6.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,907 compared to $69,703, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($40,354 compared to $44,587, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 61.8%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.6%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.87%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%).