Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,918,377 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,842 compared to $55,082, a difference of 45.6%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $123,831, a difference of 34.9%), and median household income ($75,814 compared to $100,306, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $54,830, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $44,587, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.7%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.75%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 55.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 31.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.0%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 133.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 109.4%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 93.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 54.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%).