Houma vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,660,831 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.956. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.473% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 473.3 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 57.4%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $54,668, a difference of 22.0%), and median female earnings ($30,343 compared to $34,895, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,949 compared to $40,388, a difference of 3.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $80,260, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($32,996 compared to $34,886, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.4%), single female poverty (33.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother poverty (43.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (18.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and family poverty (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 16.8%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.46, a difference of 9.0%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.58%), family households (65.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.5%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 59.9%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.0%), ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.4%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.8%).