Crow vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,941,515 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Apache within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 28.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $80,260, a difference of 12.5%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $70,927, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $34,895, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $40,388, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $49,395, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 36.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father poverty (30.3% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 216.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 216.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 95.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.0%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.46, a difference of 10.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (99.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (99.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.2%).