Fijian vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,492,460 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Apache within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.2%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $34,886, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $70,927, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $80,260, a difference of 0.38%), median earnings ($40,193 compared to $40,388, a difference of 0.49%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $34,895, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 56.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 15.6%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 86.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 72.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.1%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.12%), female disability (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.3%).