Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Cuban
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Cubans
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cuban Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,216,893 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.141% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 140.9 Cubans.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $37,383, a difference of 36.2%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $84,981, a difference of 35.1%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $46,580, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $50,655, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $34,942, a difference of 23.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Tragic $37,383 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Tragic $84,981 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Tragic $73,392 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Tragic $40,619 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Tragic $46,580 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Tragic $34,942 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Tragic $50,655 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Tragic $81,483 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Tragic $86,301 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Tragic $49,152 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 23.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 76.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Poor 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 35.3%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 67.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Poor 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 39.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.1%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 90.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 85.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Tragic 58.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Tragic 41.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Cuban Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.96%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Cuban |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |