Immigrants from Latvia vs Black/African American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,569,464 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Blacks/African Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 67.7 Blacks/African Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $73,370, a difference of 43.8%), per capita income ($50,914 compared to $35,564, a difference of 43.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $78,556, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $44,381, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $35,315, a difference of 22.0%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 69.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 68.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 19.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 50.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 64.1%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 52.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 2.7%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 65.2%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.0%).