Immigrants from Latvia vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,041,648 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 148.4 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $34,195, a difference of 48.9%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $44,010, a difference of 39.6%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $85,728, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $55,573, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $53,077, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.3%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 96.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 54.9%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 126.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 125.0%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 120.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.5%).