Immigrants from Latvia vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,856,264 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 91.0 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $39,870, a difference of 27.7%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $51,473, a difference of 19.3%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $97,288, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,365, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $57,919, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $38,528, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.2%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.2%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.5%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 64.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.3%).