Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,987,902 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 126.2 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $76,910, a difference of 37.2%), per capita income ($50,914 compared to $37,193, a difference of 36.9%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $45,176, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $45,793, a difference of 13.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $53,174, a difference of 20.9%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $35,027, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 52.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 45.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.9%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (62.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.1%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.3%).