Comanche vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,669,125 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $50,044, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $109,719, a difference of 27.9%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $113,229, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,383, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $41,825, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.3%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 61.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 49.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.2%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 13.5%).