Comanche vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Crow
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,254,335 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.218% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 217.7 Crow.
Comanche vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.3%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $31,729, a difference of 20.0%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $63,681, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $47,012, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,266, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $38,707, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Comanche vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 63.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 59.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.3%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Comanche vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 270.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 269.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 201.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Crow |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Comanche vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 78.3% |
Comanche vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.7%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.82, a difference of 17.6%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Crow |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 40.4% |
Comanche vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Comanche vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.7%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Comanche vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.90%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Crow |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |