Choctaw vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Ethiopians
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,349,859 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 86.1 Ethiopians.
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,569, a difference of 29.4%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $89,640, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $56,243, a difference of 17.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,818, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,989, a difference of 22.5%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 53.0%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 65.9%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 62.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.43%), 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Choctaw vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 70.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.5%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Ethiopian |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |