Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Tlingit-Haida
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Tlingit-Haida
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,359,526 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Tlingit-Haida.
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $55,914, a difference of 23.0%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $43,516, a difference of 20.9%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $83,968, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $52,409, a difference of 9.8%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $45,468, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $39,513, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Average $43,516 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Fair $101,092 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Fair $83,968 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Fair $45,468 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Poor $52,409 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Average $39,513 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $55,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Fair $92,987 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Poor $97,417 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Excellent $62,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 47.3%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.4%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.2%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 17.8%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Fair 13.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Average 11.6% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 135.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 23.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Fair 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 40.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.86%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 61.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Fair 32.2% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Good 55.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Good 19.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.45%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Poor 1.7% |
Choctaw vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 4.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 50.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.4% |