Immigrants from Latin America vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,421,445 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $42,792, a difference of 16.2%), median family income ($86,989 compared to $100,119, a difference of 15.1%), and median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $53,967, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $51,028, a difference of 0.70%), median household income ($75,420 compared to $82,186, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $38,573, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 55.2%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.18%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.8%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (67.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%).