Fijian vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,438,256 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 137.7 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $91,498, a difference of 14.4%), median household income ($74,205 compared to $82,410, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $38,603, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $58,761, a difference of 3.5%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $38,442, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.050%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.1%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.42, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 53.5%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.10%), ged/equivalency (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (90.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 22.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.6%).