Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nepalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belarus

Nepalese

Good
Poor
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nepalese Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,787,535 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Nepalese.
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Nepalese Communities

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $38,442, a difference of 30.8%), median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $49,458, a difference of 26.7%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $94,153, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $54,472, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $58,761, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($94,399 compared to $82,410, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,303
Tragic
$38,442
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,586
Tragic
$94,153
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,399
Poor
$82,410
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,043
Tragic
$43,860
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,658
Tragic
$49,458
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,757
Tragic
$38,603
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,743
Exceptional
$54,472
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,393
Poor
$91,498
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,430
Tragic
$93,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,162
Tragic
$58,761
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
22.2%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.4%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Fair
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.6%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Tragic
33.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.5%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.8%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.8%), and births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (63.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
30.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
33.5%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 126.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 84.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 60.6%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.9%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
8.7%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 82.5%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 80.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
95.5%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
95.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
94.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
93.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
92.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
92.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
90.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
88.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
85.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
54.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
39.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
29.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Nepalese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelarusNepalese
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
28.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%