Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,190,037 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 13.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $101,091, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $59,417, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $42,304, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $62,939, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($46,564 compared to $50,274, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.0%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.1%), associate's degree (46.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.31%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%).