Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,827,734 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $119,094, a difference of 22.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $109,741, a difference of 21.4%), and median household income ($83,289 compared to $99,943, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $54,512, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $44,161, a difference of 9.7%), and median earnings ($46,564 compared to $53,268, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%).