Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,294,561 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 53.4 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.8%), per capita income ($42,950 compared to $38,165, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $80,863, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $47,981, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $37,970, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($46,564 compared to $42,923, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.57%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%).