Immigrants from Africa vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,221,446 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 28.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $51,463, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $85,571, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $40,299, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $51,844, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($46,564 compared to $44,552, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 40.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 35.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 33.3%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 30.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 15.1%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.61%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 137.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.34%), 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 23.4%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%).