French American Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,031,878 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 125.5 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $80,863, a difference of 6.2%), and per capita income ($40,244 compared to $38,165, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,333 compared to $42,923, a difference of 0.96%), householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $53,967, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($76,387 compared to $74,896, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.9%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother poverty (33.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.40%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.7%), married-couple households (44.1% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.67%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.14%), college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).