French American Indian vs Immigrants from Haiti Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,980,509 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.813% in Immigrants from Haiti. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 812.6 Immigrants from Haiti.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $45,266, a difference of 11.8%), and median family income ($92,872 compared to $84,018, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $36,203, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $50,398, a difference of 2.9%), and median household income ($76,387 compared to $72,599, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 35.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.2%), currently married (45.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 51.7%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 47.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%).