French American Indian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,042,554 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.839. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.464% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 464.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $51,361, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $114,336, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($92,872 compared to $118,053, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $55,028, a difference of 12.3%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $43,317, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 46.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 13.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (62.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.3%), master's degree (12.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 12.1%).