French American Indian vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,625,084 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.303% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 303.3 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $46,430, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($76,387 compared to $87,930, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $42,229, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $60,647, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $54,593, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and single male poverty (15.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.33%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.34%), and family households (62.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.7%).