Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,558,361 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,669 compared to $51,361, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($96,231 compared to $118,053, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $108,149, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $55,028, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $66,087, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (13.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.1%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.5%).